BRINGING OURSELVES TO WORK
In October 2012, just after the feel good Olympics, the Barrett Values Centre conducted a survey of the UK nation’s values. What it revealed was nothing short of shocking.
When asked what their top 10 personal values were, people said:
Caring, Family, Honesty, Humour/fun, Friendship, Fairness, Compassion, Independence, Respect, Trust.
Sounds like a pretty nice bunch of people.
When asked what were the top 10 values of the nation, they said:
Bureaucracy, Crime/violence, Uncertainty about the future, Corruption, Blame, Wasted resources, Media influence, Conflict/aggression, Drugs/alcohol, Apathy.
Sounds like rather a nasty nation.
One year on, I still struggle to understand the reasons for the chasm between the two responses.
But reflecting on it recently, it occurred to me that my own experiences with a number of organisations have not been so different.
Whenever I help an organisation define their brand, I generally recommend conducting a values survey, using the Barrett approach. In almost all cases, there is a significant gap between the personal values of the staff (including leadership) and the perceived values of the organisation.
In other words, people are unable to bring themselves fully to work.
This is troubling. It seems that whenever we put people together in an organisational unit, we stand a very high chance of producing an uncomfortable and in some cases toxic culture. And if the culture is not right, there is no chance of delivering a positive and cohesive brand experience, internally or externally.
You would think it couldn’t be so hard. Assemble a like-minded group of people, give them a common purpose and agree a set of core values that define their communal behaviour. And hey presto.
So where does it go wrong? Is it something to do with the two articles above? Have we perhaps got our spotlights in the wrong place?
I hope so. Because if we begin to focus them on the right things, we could release a lot of untapped human and brand potential.
|